|
|
|||||||
| Register | Bookmark Us! | Donate | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Online Quizzes | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Sport Football, Formula One, Rugby, Javelin Catching, ... |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Moderator
My Mood:
|
The outcome of the 2007 drivers’ world championship has been plunged into renewed doubt after McLaren declared its intention to appeal the decision of the Interlagos stewards not to penalise Williams and BMW Sauber for alleged fuel irregularities.
After Sunday’s Brazilian Grand Prix the stewards analysed fuel samples taken from the Williams and BMW cars during their pit stops, which appeared to show temperatures outside the permitted range. The enquiry into an apparently arcane technical issue had potentially huge repercussions, since Williams driver Nico Rosberg and BMW’s Robert Kubica and Nick Heidfeld finished the race fourth, fifth and sixth respectively – ahead of Lewis Hamilton, who lost the world title to Kimi Raikkonen by a single point after a disastrous race. Had the three drivers been disqualified, Hamilton would have been promoted to fourth place and declared world champion. But because the stewards deemed the evidence inconclusive, they opted not to impose any penalties and upheld the original result, confirming Raikkonen as champion. However, a McLaren spokeswoman told ITV-F1.com late on Sunday evening that the team intends to challenge the stewards’ ruling in the FIA’s International Court of Appeal – leaving the title result hanging in the balance once again. McLaren has notified the governing body of its intentions but no appeal date has yet been set. A couple of hours earlier, in a statement explaining their decision, the stewards said they could not prove that the fuel used by Williams and BMW was illegal. Article 6.5.5 of the Formula 1 technical regulations states: “No fuel on board the car may be more than 10 degrees centigrade below ambient temperature.” FIA technical delegate Jo Bauer reported that the fuel samples from all four cars showed temperatures 12-14C lower than the ambient at the time. But the stewards said they could not be certain the temperatures were outside the 10C limit due to conflicting evidence. They pointed to a discrepancy between the ambient temperature recorded on the Formula One Management timing monitors and that provided by the FIA and team-contracted meteorologists Meteo France – and said there was no “regulation stating in clear terms that for the purposes of Article 6.5.5 the definitive ambient temperature shall be indicated on the FOM timing monitors alone”. They also said they lacked “a precise reading of the temperature of ‘fuel on board the car’ which shows fuel at more than 10 degrees centigrade below ambient temperature”. Their statement concluded: “In view of the matters referred to above, the stewards consider that…there must be sufficient doubt as to both the temperature of the fuel actually ‘on board the car’ and also as to the true ambient temperature as to render it inappropriate to impose a penalty”.
__________________
TheGuru |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |||||||||||
|
Administrator
My Mood:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 3,007
Credits: 12,639
Nominated 6 Times in 6 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
I have to admit to uttering a few profanities at the start of the race when Hamilton fell behind Alonso. It was a fight he didnt need to get involved in
I dont think that anything will become of the fuel irregularities. Its hard to prove without doubt that it occured Maybe next year |
|||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Junior Poster
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 17
Credits: 175
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
I feel for Hamilton honestly I do, but how many times have we been here before where it finally looks like our country might do well in something only to lose it all. Lisa x
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Administrator
My Mood:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 134
Credits: 3,905
|
Quote:
__________________
----------------------------------- Like Siliconhell? Then give a small Donation towards the hosting costs |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Sponsored links | |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Super Duper Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Pontefract!
Posts: 669
Credits: 3,728
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
what bugs me is that had it have been a british car that was accused of something like that I bet the evidence would have been there! If there's no evidence of the temperature being too low, how could it have been recorded in the first place?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||||||||||||
|
Administrator
My Mood:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Wigan, UK
Posts: 3,007
Credits: 12,639
Nominated 6 Times in 6 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
|
Quote:
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|