|
|
|||||||
| Register | Bookmark Us! | Donate | Forum Rules | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Online Quizzes | Arcade | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Notices |
| Current Affairs Chat about whats going on in the World. You can also find the latest Wacky News from around the globe |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
My Mood:
|
Mesa, Arizona - Officials at an Arizona school suspended a 13-year-old boy for sketching what looked like a gun, saying the action posed a threat to his classmates.
The boy's parents said the drawing was a harmless doodle and school officials overreacted. "The school made him feel like he committed a crime. They are doing more damage than good," said the boy's mother, Paula Mosteller. The drawing did not show blood, bullets, injuries or target any human, the parents said. And the East Valley Tribune reported that the boy said he did not intend for the picture to be a threat. Administrators of Payne Junior High in nearby Chandler suspended the boy on Monday for five days but later reduced it to three days. The boy's father, Ben Mosteller, said that when he went to the school to discuss his son's punishment, school officials mentioned the seriousness of the issue and talked about the 1999 massacre at Colorado's Columbine High School, where two teenagers shot and killed 12 students, a teacher and themselves. Mosteller said he was offended by the reference. Chandler district spokesperson Terry Locke said the crude sketch was "absolutely considered a threat", and that threatening words or pictures are punishable. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Do you think the school was justified in their actions or you do think they've overreacted? |
|
To err is human. To ARRR is pirate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||||||
|
Moderator
My Mood:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 917
Credits: 6,853
Nominated 18 Times in 7 Posts
|
I think the whole thing is ridiculous. It is only natural for boys (particuarly) to be interested in guns or weapons.
Does this reaction mean that they will not be studying war in history or Shakepeare as an example in Literature classes because they mention weaponry of some description? | ||||||||
|
Kaz
"I guess I should warn you: If I turn out to be particularly clear, you've probably misunderstood what I said." |
|||||||||
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|